The study shows belief perseverance even after the evidence is corrected.
研究显示,即使证据被纠正,人们仍会出现信念固着。
Although the report was later withdrawn, belief perseverance led many readers to keep repeating the original claim, treating it as common sense.
尽管该报告后来被撤回,信念固着仍让许多读者继续重复最初的说法,把它当作“不言自明的常识”。
Thinking, Fast and Slow(Daniel Kahneman,《思考,快与慢》)——在讨论直觉判断与偏差时提及类似“证据更正后仍坚持原判断”的现象(常与信念固着并置讨论)。
The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion(Jonathan Haidt,《正义之心》)——讨论道德直觉与事后辩护,涉及人们为何难以放弃既有信念的机制。
*Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me)*(Carol Tavris & Elliot Aronson,《错不在我》)——围绕自我辩护与认知失调,呈现“即使被证明错了也继续相信/合理化”的心理路径。
Anderson, Lepper & Ross (1979) “Perseverance of Social Theories: The Role of Explanation in the Persistence of Discredited Information”——经典学术论文,系统提出并验证“belief perseverance/信念固着”的实验研究框架。